Simply not true, feel free to back up your baseless claim with a link to him speaking gibberish. You won’t find one even going back 15 years or more.
You’re either misinformed or willfully lying.
You’re either misinformed or willfully lying.
he claimed pandemic restrictions were worse than nazi germany ("you could at least hide in the attic like Anne Frank". She was sent to a concentration camp and died after being discovered.
On HIV and AIDS: he explicitly blames HIV on vaccine research. "Kennedy then claimed that “the medical research on these diseases and vaccine research has actually created some of the worst plagues in our history. Anybody who reads The River will come away pretty much convinced that HIV also came from a vaccine program, there’s plenty of evidence on that as well.”"
These are all quoted directly attributed to him, so it's hard to see how we're misinformed.
And ask yourself this - how is it that that book is still sold if it’s all bullshit?
That was one of the many things bouncing around the back of my head as I smugly dismissed him until I watched the Lex Fridman podcast.
Look, I used to think exactly like everybody on hacker news, until I actually listen to the man. Do I agree with everything he says, no, but pretty close… And if you take the time to actually listen to him, you’ll find that he’s pretty reasonable on every single topic. And he’s willing to change his position if anybody can refute and/or provide actual evidence to do so. No one has.
This is why no one will debate him either by the way, isn’t that a little curious? A.k.a. nobody from the virology community. Because they simply can’t refute him based on actual science and facts.
Seriously go listen to rfk on Lex Fridman, if you don’t, then you will never really know the truth will you? And I personally prefer the Lex Fridman podcast but he’s been on Joe Rogan and numerous other podcasts over the last few weeks and truthfully they’re all excellent.
> And ask yourself this - how is it that that book is still sold if it’s all bullshit?
Give me an hour on Amazon and I could find dozens, if not hundreds, of similarly "qualified" books on:
- UFOs, aliens, and "close encounters"
- Bigfoot, Chupacabra, and other cryptids
- Ghosts, Poltergeists, and other "hauntings"
And, let me be clear: I am not talking about fictional novels which include such things; I am talking about "non-fiction" which purports to prove their existence.
Do you believe all of those books must be true as well? Why or why not?
Why do you think that is? Could it be the fact that every single claim he made against Gates, Fauci and Big Pharma is well-sourced and air-tight.
Remember, it isn’t slander or liable if it is provably true.
The virology community isn't debating him because if you debate the conspiracy nuts, you give them creedence and also it's 100X harder to disprove bad ideas.