> As a basic rule, you can't use anecdotes to draw assumptions about wide group trends.

I think you missed the point again, because my post was not trying to use anecdotes to draw assumptions about wide group trends. It was an expression of curiosity and a desire to see data, which at least in my mind is quite opposed to drawing assumptions (or making an argument, or a generalized statement as you had previously written).

Nevertheless, this is an interesting post with some good information and I appreciate the time you took to write it out.

> They totally are, speaking for populations! This is how de-anonymization typically works. They also correlate with class and income.

This part in particular was very informative; I'll be doing some more reading on this thanks to your explanation.