John Carmack's permanent answer on projects is "When it's done". The only truthful answer when developing anything new and interesting.
John Carmack's permanent answer on projects is "When it's done". The only truthful answer when developing anything new and interesting.
It seems he was a bully, too, at least in the early days: http://blog.tomevslin.com/2007/05/microsoft_memor.html
Then again, most people probably don't care, given Microsoft's financial results.
He was trying to get him to do it really quickly so he could justify paying him as little as possible. He got it for $0, so that made him happy.
> Gates focuses on what is good for the users and not on M$ controlling the Switcher
He wanted to take advantage of the fact that his apps had very low memory footprints. Switcher was the way to do it. He had no need to control Switcher itself. The fact that he wanted the project done quickly to save money says to me he didn't really care about quality, which users obviously do.
This is an amusing lesson in how different people interpret the exact same thing so differently.