The question is why are they so successful in doing this. Why do organizations by default use Salesforce.
I have never used nor worked at an organization that is built on top of Salesforce.
Just a regular web dev.
I have never used nor worked at an organization that is built on top of Salesforce.
Just a regular web dev.
I've tried twice to buck this trend at small startups. I was successful in getting the companies to use a lightweight, elegant, user-friendly, not-Salesforce CRM system when they were small (<10 people). And everyone was happy. And in both cases, as soon as the organization got large enough that the professional sales people came on board, they said "what is this garbage where is my Salesforce", and that was that.
This is a VERY hard pattern to break, unfortunately.
After another client found that their Batchbook CRM solution was also being EOL'd, I started to feel like going for the biggest most well-known market-leading CRMs ends up being a good choice just from the point-of-view of data longevity and peace of mind.
I really wish 37 Signals open-sourced Highrise, or that CiviCRM or any of the other open source CRMs managed to get to a level of polish and ease of use so that I could ditch Salesforce, but I've yet to find anything that could justify such a move away from the Salesforce behemoth.
Can you please name these softwares?
You probably do. Salesforce has all kinds of different products from Slack to Mulesoft and Tableau. Salesforce starts their pipeline by solving one problem, making that work well from a business ROI perspective, and then they pitch you on another and another and another with package pricing. This is basically the Oracle model and how Larry got his blood money.
We are a very M$ bias company, hence, no slack.