Hacker News Reader

Comment by havnagiggle | Hacker News Reader

Wait for the blog post on how beautiful Val++ is.

Val<<>> when they inevitably introduce templates and stringstreams

In 2028, when we revive the One True Programming Paradigm (for Enterprise Software)™, we'll have bestowed upon us the glorious Objective-Val

In 2028, we will still be writing code in C and Fortran. And there will be all these new languages X++ that would be promising to replace either or both ;) ;) ;)

X++ already exists, better pick another name.

EDIT: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamicsax-2012/developer/...

Swift++, or Swifttt.

Taylor Swift’s subject-oriented programming language – Swifties.

It would have: • garbage collection (Shake It Off) • error correction (Bad Blood) • closures (Closure) • optionals (Would’ve, Could’ve, Should’ve) • automatic reference counting (Right Where You Left Me) • REPL (I Knew You Were Trouble) • variable mutability (Everything Has Changed and Evermore) • guard condition (Eyes Open) • strict typing (You Belong With Me)

After compiling run the binary by issuing the command: Run {filename}

To debug: Tell Me Why {filename}

I was almost murdered a few years ago when I told a classroom full of senior girls at a suburban high school that Taylor Swift was overrated (I just wanted to see what would happen if I poked the bear).

That is all I know about Taylor Swift. But it seems like you are onto something here. :D

You were lucky to make it out alive.

bahahaha this is such a nichey yet epic comment

Petition to change all languages with “+” to repeat the last character for each plus. Going down the list of languages on Wikipedia[0]

A+ becomes AA C++ = CCC Clik++ never mind this was a bad call. JJJ RRR Visual JJJ XXX (nice) xBaseee ZZZ

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_programming_languages

X+++

With AbstractSingletonProxyFactoryBean and family present as core language features.

Might have a future in mobile.

sounds good, but ill wait for c-interop so my moneys on valjective-c

Better write it like `Val< <> >` otherwise the parser will get confused.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com