if it is "your" company but you cannot change it, I put that it is not your company. but that in fact you are just its employee and not the other way around.
Good catch. I rephrased it more to what I intended. (Parent replied to my initial comment: "If you can't change your Company, change your Company.")
If I am catching your meaning correctly, I would also lower-case the second use of “company” to drive home a different usage of the word.
I nitpick only because it’s a clever turn of a word that deserves understanding.
Fixed!
Did we just witness a nit-picky "code" review, right here in the comments? I think we did.
It wasn't nit picky as I wouldn't have understood what the author meant before the reviewers came in and suggested improvements.
Except that phrase is a pretty well-known aphorism. It's sort of the equivalent of using map and filter or reduce on a collection - just because a programmer hasn't seen map, filter, and reduce doesn't mean it's wrong. Perhaps the programmer needs more experience.