No, weight the scientific data by its credibility and importance, as one does with all scientific data.
As to what “agenda” the author has, I’m unsure. Does the above commenter think the author holds shares in Carrier, and will benefit from the sale of air conditioners?
edit I have never heard of this person before today
That's not a STEM science degree.
Many people have interacted with him at length over the past decades and he bends actual science results to cast as much shade as he can get away with over AGW while continuously claiming he accepts the science.
If anything the desmog link above is too kind.