https://lwn.net/ml/fedora-devel/CAJqbrbeOZrHvYjvMCc=qGZD_VXB...
=== What data might we collect? ===
We are not proposing to collect any [...] particular metrics
just yet, because a process for Fedora community approval of
metrics to be collected does not yet exist. That said, in the
interests of maximum transparency, we wish to give you an idea
of what sorts of metrics we might propose to collect in the
future.
One of the main goals of metrics collection is to analyze
whether Red Hat is achieving its goal to make Fedora Workstation
the premier developer platform for cloud software development.
Accordingly, we want to know things like which IDEs are most
popular among our users, and which runtimes are used to create
containers using Toolbx.
Metrics can also be used to inform user interface design
decisions. For example, we want to collect the clickthrough
rate of the recommended software banners in GNOME Software to
assess which banners are actually useful to users. We also want
to know how frequently panels in gnome-control-center are
visited to determine which panels could be consolidated or
removed, because there are other settings we want to add, but
our usability research indicates that the current high quantity
of settings panels already makes it difficult for users
to find commonly-used settings.
Metrics can help us understand the hardware we should be
optimizing Fedora for. For example, our boot performance on hard
drives dropped drastically when systemd-readahead was removed.
Ubuntu has maintained its own readahead implementation, but
Fedora does not because we assume that not many users use Fedora
on hard drives. It would be nice to collect a metric that
indicates whether primary storage is a solid state drive or a
hard disk, so we can see actual hard drive usage instead of
guessing. We would also want to collect hardware information
that would be useful for collaboration with hardware vendors
(such as Lenovo), such as laptop model ID.
Other Fedora teams may have other metrics they wish to collect.
For example, Fedora localization wishes to count users of
particular locales to evaluate which locales are in poorer shape
relative to their usage.
This is only a small sample of what we might want to know; no
doubt other community members can think of many more interesting
data points to collect.
That last piece "no doubt other community members can think of many more interesting data points
to collect" sounds pretty bad for telemetry that's enabled by default, with people having to opt out of it. :(