It is immediately noticeably nicer to drive there vs neighboring states.
It also generates a few fun stories, such as the grandfathered-still-existing tall sign north of Brattleboro that said "Steak $5.99" for years after the steak house had changed. Eventually, while it was being leased to an Asian restaurant, people protested that it was false advertising (as steak had not been available for years and certainly not at that price). The landlord still wanting to keep the sign, but not allowed to change it, removed the "S", "K", and "$5.99", so the sign read "TEA" for many more years, and AFAIK, still does.
"...in a single year, São Paulo removed 15,000 billboards, many of which were replaced by street art."
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/aug/11/can-cities-ki...
(I would possibly make an exception for cases where people want to put their speech on their land, but the moment it's a corporation paying someone to put up an advert? That's not individual speech any more, is it?)
We can make it really tedious to advertise by forcing them to buy the land itself and deal with title transfer, without impacting free speech of people.