Your "facts" are not, as you appear to believe, counter evidence but merely misleading and goalpost-shifting distractions from the claim that inordinate sums have been spent by the fossil fuel industry supporting organizations whose entire purpose is to produce insidiously distorted argumentation and PR, aimed at producing misinformation and disinformation on fossil fuel impact on climate change.

For example, your argument that one incomplete list of a single company's "charitable activity" is "nowhere close to billions of dollars" when the claim was "probably billions" across the entire industry, where "probably billions" is pretty obviously no more than a vague gesture at "huge amounts of money".

That you find a climate-disinformation spend even in the $10s of millions acceptable is something you might ponder before you start lecturing people on what sites they should post on.