Hacker News Reader

The paper actually makes no claim about the percentage of time that women hunt relative to men.

So I’m not sure where you got the data for your last sentence

if they told you that men hunt 350 times more by volume (see first source) it would make their thesis sound irrelevant

I edited my comment to add sources

The first source (which you're citing for the volume number) warns against making this sort of volume estimate and inferring differences between men and women hunting, in part because of the small sample size of women hunters and because women tended to hunt in pooled/group settings.

The pooled/group setting difference is something that the original paper also calls out.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com