There's also longstanding evidence that Amazon uses PIP's just to recapture locked RSU shares after bad financial quarters. Basically, have a bad financial quarter, just tell managers they have to stack rank and fire a few more employees than usual.
There's also longstanding evidence that Amazon uses PIP's just to recapture locked RSU shares after bad financial quarters. Basically, have a bad financial quarter, just tell managers they have to stack rank and fire a few more employees than usual.
If you're offered the choice of PIP or severance, it's usually best to take the severance.
> after bad financial quarters
It's a typical way to lower staffing levels without an official layoff. Instead of letting bottom 5% go, make it the bottom 10%. Where "bottom" can have multiple meanings.
I work in an organization where it is very difficult to fire marginal employees and while job security is great, the poor performers really drag down everyone else’s morale. PIPs if utilized properly can be a great way to rehabilitate these employees, even if they ultimately move on to other teams.
that is a big IF
Just an anecdote, but when I was at amazon I saw more undeserved pips than deserved ones. Often I was left wondering why that person was in pip but not me. From my vantage point, they did almost as much, and as good work as I did. In the end, it was the quota that had to be fulfilled and they got unlucky.