If you want to do spying you don't exclude anyone or it's pointless. Journalist is a great cover for spies- ask the CIA.
If you want to do spying you don't exclude anyone or it's pointless. Journalist is a great cover for spies- ask the CIA.
Otherwise, what's the point of having journalists around that try to uncover corruption of government / military / security services?
I guess you're not really considering that allowing or encouraging corruption internally can also kill a government?
Note that China has been through multiple "purges" of corrupt officials. (Strangely, it seems to happen whenever they have a new leader who needs to remove competitors. ;)) So the corruption potential seems to be present everywhere.
It's just that in the west we've (thus far) recognised the problem, and journalists are part of that solution.
Removing that solution due to fear seems to be a bad direction for long term survival as well.
I’m pretty open to being wrong on this one but do you have any case studies to point to that say otherwise?