The Wii U on the other hand completely flew under most people's radar. People were over the Wii and then Nintendo releases the Wii U. Most people thought it was an addon tablet because that's all they kept showing, just Wii remotes and the tablet.
The Wii U on the other hand completely flew under most people's radar. People were over the Wii and then Nintendo releases the Wii U. Most people thought it was an addon tablet because that's all they kept showing, just Wii remotes and the tablet.
Compare that to PlayStation 4/PlayStation 4 Pro/PlayStation 5 (and yeah, I'm not going to argue that 'pro' isn't a stupid designation for a slightly-more-powerful-than-before console), but it's at least obvious where they sit in the lineup.
Seems pretty intuitive..
It should be pretty obvious that Series > One > 360.
I think it’s absolutely baffling that somebody might find such a perfectly logical and reasonable naming system confusing.
But why does Series > One?
What is obvious about series being better than 360? why would someone think that if they were just presented with those names and nothing else?
Why would someone think x is better than s without doing any research?
AFAIK, S is “no physical media”
AFAIK, “series” means “fancy”
I’ve only ever purchased XBox consoles and currently rock an XBox One.
Lemme fix your marketing, XBox: call the “no drive” ones “cloud” or “online” or “vapor” or whatever.
Call your next one 9006 so it is simultaneously “over 9000”, and puts you back in the semver race with PlayStation. /s
https://www.xbox.com/en-US/consoles/compare
Yes the names are not as easy to compare as PS5 vs PS4, but upon cursory investigation it's blatantly obvious that the X is more powerful than the S.
The part I emphasize is exactly the argument of the person you're responding.
You wouldn't google Playstation 4 and 5 to find out which is which. I have no idea why Microsoft would do this. Try sending your mother out to buy one. Would she know which one to buy and understand the difference?
"it's not even obvious which is the more powerful model, there's no mention anywhere of what X and S stand for."
At a glance the difference between the X and the S could be like the PS4 vs PS4 Slim, or the PS5 and PS5 Digital Edition.
Do they? I don't. At this moment, I couldn't tell you the name of Microsoft's newest console, because their naming convention is so convoluted. Meanwhile, I can tell from a glance that the PS5 is newer than the PS4.
Granted, I'm not a console gamer, but neither are (most) parents buying consoles for their children.
"Ehh, people will know what we're talking about" seems like a haphazard marketing strategy.
Edit: I googled it. Xbox X and the old one is Xbox One X? That is simply hilariously stupid.
Sony/Apple/Samsung have this one solid - just release the next semver and market the hell out of it. Don't make me confused when I'm thinking about paying you money. Note: even the ones that aren't "on the version treadmill" do poorly: "iPhone mini" vs. "Samsung Fold" etc are niche products and exist to essentially sell the mainline item.
It wasn't very long ago that kids were struggling to get their parents to stop calling xbox and playstation "the nintendo". Young parents today are probably comfortable with the brands of xbox and playstation, having grown up with those brands, but expecting them to be up-to-date on the latest models isn't smart. There can be a considerable gap in understanding between those who are tuned into gaming matters and those who might be making the actual purchase. The value of simple branding should not be underestimated.
If they want me to check on google, they failed.
Also it is funny that you attack people on.. hacker news for not understanding the versioning.
It just proves that microsoft does it in a bad way.
But fret not, there's an easy shortcut to see which Microsoft product is newer. Just try them side by side and whichever has more advertisements is newer.