Hacker News Reader

the worst part about it is that when they give a time limit they make it sound like they're doing you a favor.

"we have a takehome, but don't worry! it's just a quick little thing that should just take an hour to throw together. we're not like those other companies that give you a huge task"

View on HN

Exactly. Then I've been wondering, how many people are actually going over the time? Are the reviewers actually checking any time stamps?

What can they realistically check?

I see two data points they could have: time when the template was downloaded (assuming it’s a unique link only you can access, and you didn’t download it > once/all downloads are logged) or emailed, and the time it was submitted.

All other time stamps can be spoofed.

No, I agree. I just mean like when they say, hey this will take 2 hours, how do they know? Do they even care? Or just everyone cheats and does more than the allotted time?

I did one take home that was timed in coderpad. I thought that was a little more fair.

They have no idea how long they take. They come up with a task first and then slap a time limit on it afterwards so they don’t feel bad about asking too much.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com