Reliable even down to the bug behaviors...
Reliable even down to the bug behaviors...
IMO it makes more sense to communicate the expected impact of the changes, so that downstream can read a patch bump as unlikely to cause issues.
I'm sure it's important to have a stable technology to train on in the military; at the same time, I remember one of their open-days they were showing off a civilian in-flight entertainment system that was so clearly overpriced for what it was that I knew even as I saw it that I could've done better for lower unit-cost. This isn't to show off, even despite my having not yet finished secondary school at the time — my solution would've been little more than "glue laptop to chair/wall in front", as tablets weren't something people discussed much around me in the 90s — it's just that the business solution was really unimpressive.
I assume there's secret military equivalents to that public project.
[0] if you exclude the job interview at Lockheed Martin for the year in industry paid work experience part of my degree, which didn't go further than an interview
Theres a reason there's so many steps to accept hardware.