If this were a human driver, at least half of those would loose you your driver's license. Why are there no such consequences for the companies?
There was a case in the news where someone was exceeding the posted speed-limit by 150kph on an undivided highway (i.e. just a stripe between you and the traffic going the opposite direction) and got a 6 month suspension.
I was on the jury for a case where the defendant was involved his third DUI, fled the scene of the accident, and still had his license.
We need to stop allowing computational agents (and thus those who deploy them) to escape blame as if they don't exist, or as if their behavior is just nobody's fault. Computational agents need to be viewed as bona fide actors (as people are), with the actions of the computational agent being considered the willful actions of whomever deployed it.
Either way, none of those address the new problem of robotaxis. If any normal human did this type of thing, you could go scream at them or honk your horn enough for them to figure it out. If it isn't programmed into the robotaxis logic it won't do anything as shown. Or possibly do the wrong thing.
https://www.ch.ch/en/vehicles-and-traffic/how-to-behave-in-r...