There's also the more recent example of Twitter censoring content ahead of the election in Turkey[0] which curiously did not make it into the Twitter Files reporting.
Quoting 3 sources that range from "right" to "extreme right" doesn't help your case.
(Edit: typos)
Genetic fallacies don't help yours.
I assume you meant generic fallacies, but since neither one makes sense I will go with genetic because it sounds more fun. Could be a fun plotline in a biotech dystopia psychological-thriller film.
Don't even know what you're trying to say, here...
Human psychology has entered the chat.
The first one does not show gov forcing anything. Neither does the third one (contrary to the censorship idea, it includes multiple cases of internal debates and successful pushing against the gov intentions).
The second one talks about access to private data: no details, so it's hard to say if he means complying with lawful requests or not.