Law enforcement has their quotas and they'll use any garbage they can to fill it, but it's kind of hilarious that people just trust their memories for important stuff they can control.
Law enforcement has their quotas and they'll use any garbage they can to fill it, but it's kind of hilarious that people just trust their memories for important stuff they can control.
Commentary: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/04/05/how-elizabeth-...
Rebuttal: https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2021/04/25/the-new-yorkers-hi...
The whyevolutionistrue rebuttal is insubstantial, it doesn't address this at all.
How is this even slightly relevant?
If some memories are false, and other memories are true, and none of us can tell which is which, then according to our principles of justice we must act as if all memories are potentially false.
"Memory as evidence" crumbles at that point.
Completely normal. Absolutely no reason to question her work.
She did some CIA consulting, too.