"...hallucinatory happytalk that paints with a very broad brush, and delivers not the tone you want, but an abstracted 'popularized' tone likely to convince large numbers of stupid and gullible people."
You capture essence beautifully.
You capture essence beautifully.
You could GPT-ize what I said into 'feel-good talk' or 'hallmark cards' but you would lose the concept of 'the very broad brush does not deliver the tone you want, but a generalized one that will reach more people through being already based in how they see things'.
If you need to get a mass audience to see a new thing, ChatGPT is NOT your friend… it will tell them what they already know… the wild thing is how the original claim is just this, 'ChatGPT got an audience to see a new thing', but the ChatGPT-style payoff of 'they smiled bovinely and accepted the new information' is clearly what the ARTICLE AUTHOR wanted to hear, and thus it's a really suspicious take.