Sociology's reliance on MTurk is absurd but most professionally run polls are now the same thing, just dressed up to look nicer. This is why polls keep reporting lots of weird results which are then taken as absolute fact by researchers and pundits.
I saw one the other day from a professional polling firm in which exactly 7% of "the public" said they had attended a protest, no matter what the protest was about. They asked about six or seven things people might protest about, and for every single one, 7% of the panel said they'd been on such a protest. Taken at face value it led to nonsense like concluding millions of people had attended protest marches about CDBC and 15 minute cities.
Unfortunately, the panels these firms use are extremely unrepresentative of the public but are advertised as perfect proxies. People then accept this claim unthinkingly. It's a problem.