I thought the invasion of Iraq and use that f Guantanamo are universally accepted to have been pretty idiotic even by super power standards. The USA gained no security and lost inordinate amounts of money, blood and good will.
Iraqis lost a lot of blood, not americans. 99% of the people killed were innocent iraqis.
And is it just me or is there a consistency in the tone, among those who make these weird typos?
It's just weird. Also it's early in the morning and I'm a little addled.
I think sometimes the typos are speech-to-text artifacts. For instance "used that" would be phonetically similar to "used at" and I could see that easily tripping up STT. I know people that use STT and don't review the output before sending so I get weird text messages from them from time to time.
It was "and use that f Guantanamo" which is not that difficult to understand if you change "f" for "the F word".
And if I was attempting to bend the narrative, a good tool for that might be a counterargument that, tho apparently strong, is actually weak. Let's not be naive about how this works.