Language learning requires frequent classes and a decent amount of exposure (TV doesn't provide it). This is possible with older kids, not the young ones.
Imo dropping the only language that is common across the continent is a bad idea. When cultures lose intercultural comprehension, they become more isolated, and that's entirely a bad thing.
Germany is the defacto leading culture on the continent, and having a population that is able to be integrated in international information streams is critical to it playing that role well.
Just look to other countries who speak less English. You don't want to end up like the french do you?
Exactly what do you mean is the problem with the French?
Assuming I've understood you correctly, I think it's worth pointing out that the French very consciously hold onto their linguistic identity. Many people would argue that is a good thing, rather than a bad thing. I don't necessarily agree with that, but I do think that your claim of "entirely a bad thing" is something that depends a lot on your perspective.
Our music also contains more English music than German, which doesn't seem to be the case in Germany.
So in the Netherlands, we're exposed to English a lot more than German, French or Spanish speaking countries. I bet the same applies to the Nordic countries, which also have great English speaking ability
What do you believe Dutch schools do well when it comes to learning English? How large are the classes? Are there any things outside the school that might play important role in learning English?
Could it be just the language compatibility? (not sure how Switzerland would fit)
But the curriculum was not even close to what they teach in most schools. It was pretty hardcore. The groups were small (10 students max) and the teachers were relentless and actually cared.