Hacker News Reader

Comment by ajross | Hacker News Reader

It's also worth pointing out that this is an extremely limited system:

> On suitable freeway sections and where there is high traffic density, DRIVE PILOT can offer to take over the dynamic driving task, up to speeds of 40 mph.

Basically, this will follow the car in front of you in slow freeway traffic. It won't navigate, it won't even change lanes. It won't work (and it's not clear to me how it disengages) when traffic speeds up.

That's not useless. There's a reasonable argument that this is the product the market wants. But the "Germans beat Tesla" framing here is really quite spun. Autonomy and capability aren't the same thing.

View on HN

You forgot the best "feature": It allows you to take your hands off the wheel and your eyes off the road.

This is significant as it means MB takes on liability and will give you sufficient time (i think 10s in the European version) to take over.

In the world of corporate liability this is huge even if it isn't a technical achievement by itself.

Only people who don’t understand problem domain think it’s not a technical achievement.

I'll give you 2:1 odds that before this reaches market (looks like end of the year for deliveries per the article) Tesla will duplicate the stunt and lift the driver monitoring requirements in similar situations.

(Edit: two replies here playing gotcha games with prior FSD announcements. But I'm serious: Tesla can do what this Mercedes does already, essentially perfectly, and has been for the two years I've operated the vehicle. The cost to them of duplicating this stunt is near zero. I'll bet you anything they do it.)

The Tesla, who claimed they’re full self driving next year, for more than half a decade now?

Cool, let’s wait.

I think it shows how little you understand the problem, to call it a “stunt”.

They claimed in 2018 that in 2019 you will be able to let your Tesla work for you as a Robo-Taxi and make 300.000,- a year. Why would they still wait?

Why did Elon Musk wait so long to say the videos showing "him" saying "We will have full self driving in 201x" are deep fakes?

> I'll give you 2:1 odds that before this reaches market (looks like end of the year for deliveries per the article) Tesla will duplicate the stunt and lift the driver monitoring requirements in similar situations.

I'll put $100 to the charity of your choice.

are u saying current tesla CAN"T do this?

40mph with a lead vehicle in daytime on a highway?

TODAY, my model3 (on FSD beta) can go 40-80mph, without lead vehicle in night anywhere, AND take turns, watch lights, watch for pedestrians, monitor who came first in stop sign...etc etc... TODAY. Not 2 years from now.

where do i signup?

No, I'm saying Tesla won't sell an L3+ product approved for a CA autonomous vehicle deployment permit before Mercedes does.

There are lots of level 2 systems where you can take your hands of the wheel. That not the definition of level 3.

The interesting thing is it's roughly the same system my 2022 Mercedes has, except it requires my hands on the wheel (and does not disengage over 40mph). I mean, this is just adaptive cruise with lane keeping.

Really the big thing here is Mercedes is saying it's good enough (under 40mph) that the driver doesn't have to pay attention at all.

„Beating“ depends on the perspective. German engineering and marketing approaches are most certainly more conservative, which is important in certain technological advancements such as driving assistance / self-driving.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com