OpenAI is clear about the fact that ChatGPT can hallucinate, where have they ever said otherwise?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2023/03/14/gpt-4-b...
and it's had the most vocal and sensational PR about how AI needs regulation now
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/09/tech/korea-altman-chatgpt...
People assume the smalltext does not apply to them.
openAI does not get a lot of flak from the media for the amount of BS that chatGPT can blurt out
Does anyone remember what happened to Galactica which did the same thing ? That too was clearly labeled as hallucinatory . But it was shut down because they did not BS the media enough about regulations and such.
I m afraid these LLMs are turning into too much of a political game to be useful for much longer.
On the other hand, if they become political, then people will be even more incentivized to build offline, local LLMs
”ChatGPT sometimes writes plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical answers.”
It does admittedly sound innocent, it should be written with a more scary tone on to how big extent it bullshits, not just “sometimes”. Still doesn’t excuse the incompetence of the lawyer in question.