”ChatGPT sometimes writes plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical answers.”
It does admittedly sound innocent, it should be written with a more scary tone on to how big extent it bullshits, not just “sometimes”. Still doesn’t excuse the incompetence of the lawyer in question.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2023/03/14/gpt-4-b...
and it's had the most vocal and sensational PR about how AI needs regulation now
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/09/tech/korea-altman-chatgpt...
People assume the smalltext does not apply to them.
openAI does not get a lot of flak from the media for the amount of BS that chatGPT can blurt out
Does anyone remember what happened to Galactica which did the same thing ? That too was clearly labeled as hallucinatory . But it was shut down because they did not BS the media enough about regulations and such.
I m afraid these LLMs are turning into too much of a political game to be useful for much longer.
On the other hand, if they become political, then people will be even more incentivized to build offline, local LLMs