What about the idea that random people on the internet can produce believable images of your naked body and share it with people who you never consented to share it with?
Come on, it’s not that difficult.
Come on, it’s not that difficult.
most of the time all you need is replacement model with similar enough body and all you have to do is face swap.
I think that all we need now is something in reverse, generating clothed photos from nude, so in case someone really leaked your nudes you could show them that this is fake from other clothed photo.
In what way would consent be required?
If someone sits in a public park and paints a nude picture with my face on it, do I need to consent? I probably don’t even know it exists. I expect the harm would be greater if a bunch of perverts/artistic souls sought me out and asked consent for things that don’t require my consent.
Or should we require consent before someone dreams of us? Or imagines us?
I’m curious how frequently this happens, but I expect quite a bit. In high school locker rooms, I remember kids talking about pretty much every other student nude, etc etc. Should that require consent? What’s the line? When someone draws it? Or generates it? Or when they distribute it?
I think the legal limit now is based on defamation so the harm is when the fake is presented as real.
Yep, painting a pornographic nude of someone you saw in the park is creepy, weird, disrespectful, and yes you should be called a weird, disrespectful creep for doing it. Should you go to jail? No. Is there a (blurry, hard to define) line between disrespectful nude depictions and respectful ones? Yep.
This service, for example, is clearly geared toward equipping weird, disrespectful creeps.
And I'll take my clothes off and it will be shameless
'Cause everyone knows that's how you get famous
That’s all these things are, just imaginations.
Like by this logic synthesized nudity of real children shouldn’t be a problem, right?
Furthermore, I'd gladly donate bath time photos of myself as a prepubescent child if it means that some unlucky soul who has the misfortune of being born a pedophile can enjoy something he or she might consider sexually gratifying. Something that will keep him or her content instead of seeking non-consenting children IRL. We should all be feeding people like this synthesized (or donated) sexual material. The idea of withholding it for some messed up reason only serves to put innocent children at risk.
I mean the article itself says people are willing to pay extortion money than risk even fictional depictions of their naked bodies.
Maybe its time we reassess our culture...