But to reiterate existing talking points, using copyrighted works for AI weight generation is exactly the same thing as how human artists learn skills just because some people refer to the process as “learning” or “training”, and any counterarguments to this are meaningless fearmongering outdated Luddite rages, besides such uses are fair uses and transformative uses and explicitly allowed in some jurisdictions under specific terms not allowing blanket rights to regurgitation so it’s all lawful and financially fully exploitable.

forwardslash sierra.

> which are substantially similar but not copyrighted.

if it's considered substantially similar, then why is it not copyrighted? The difference must also be substantial. Therefore, it should be acceptable as a new works, rather than a derivative works.

So, like Terry Brooks then?

Exactly, laundering was what I meant, I mistranslated from German.