What I don't understand is how anyone who has read the Dobbs decision sees it as even handed and reasonable.

Ignoring stare decisis with the flimsy "history and tradition" argument is farcical, considering the jurisprudence it was overturning was in place for about 1/5 of the nation's history.

The legitimacy of the court is in question because the court is at this point another political branch .

This is because the legislature is going full scorched earth in their "advise and consent" powers as a weapon.

Reform is needed.