Workers were smoking in a space where it was explicitly not permitted, and renovation work meant there was electrical supply where "normally, no electrical is allowed in the roof space because of the extreme fire risk".
Pinpointing the exact source of ignition is a bit challenging given the fire and collapse, I suspect, but without any evidence pointing towards arson it seems like a pretty reasonable conclusion.
“Maybe it was an electrical thing or something” is far from conclusive evidence, and as OP was saying, completely incredible as a response to an event of this magnitude that attracted worldwide attention.
>pinpointing
I’m always surprised when I hear what fire forensics can figure out given the state of the evidence being worked with.
>any evidence pointing toward arson
The whole point of my original post was that all the circumstantial evidence points toward arson.
You clearly don't know how fire works and just how quickly it spreads. You also vastly underestimate how flammable the roof material was.
>all the circumstantial evidence points toward arson
Pray tell them, instead of slinging vague provocations. Better yet, if you have such clear evidence, I'm sure you're gonna go to the police or the papers with it, right?
What evidence are you talking about?
Duh.