> It's not the same thing.
No, again, they are exactly the same.
> Because looking at it from the two different perspectives leads to two different conclusions.
It doesn't, though.
> So it’s The Russians? And The Fed’s decisions have nothing to do with it?
How do you get “it’s the Russians” and “the Fed’s decisions have nothing to do with it” from me saying, “Almost everyone (policy makers, media, outside observers) recognizes and openly acknowledges that the recent inflation is largely a stimulus […] overshoot from the extremely sharp but also extremely short, and with an extraordinary rapid bounce back, COVID recession”, again?
> Who aside from the masses is buying that?
No one is buying or selling the thing you are arguing against. (In fact, the Fed Chair has actually credit the Russian War in Ukraine with contributing to the same demand decline that the Fed is trying to engineer to fight inflation, not with causing inflation. [0])
> And instead of tossing around cliches (e.g., conspiracy theories) just stick the facts.
You are the one who has invented a conspiracy of coordinated false messaging that is divorced from the facts.
> There’s a narrative in the media and it doesn’t mention The Fed.
Where?
> Funny enough, you seem to be championing that narrative.
That’s defensible if you ignore…the only thing I said about the causes of inflation, and just go on pure fantasy.
[0] https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/powell20221...