LLMs are (naturally) very sensitive to their prompts, so if the prompt includes something about being inclusive - at ChatGPT's obviously does - the LLM output will sometimes find ways to work that in in odd ways.

I don't mind as much as the commenter seems to - I have no beef with inclusivity - but I have rolled my eyes at times at what ChatGPT comes up with.

I've played with local LLMs too, including some 'uncensored' ones, but the gap in ability between them and something like GPT is still vast. I look forward to progress on this front though.

Its an especially bad idea as there are some actual safety risks when it comes to dangerous tutorials. Which will be costly to address. Political overhead is not something anyone can afford. Might be that if your proposed worldview depends on "properly educating" people, you might need to get used to the idea that you are adhering to a legacy system.