it is important to point out that wasmer is an organization that is not in good standing with the wasm/wasi community
until that is resolved, their products should probably not be viewed in good faith
until that is resolved, their products should probably not be viewed in good faith
In your view, what would it take to get the not-in-good-standing issue resolved?
What do you get out of shitposting Wasmer when they announce an initiative they are excited about? (I'm mostly trying to understand your psychology, not whether or if you have some kind of competing financial interest)
i'm summarizing well-understood opinions of the ecosystem
probably the most effective way would be for the organization to release a statement abdicating their previous controversial positions, and for the CEO to resign
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30785511
Also "we didn't sign the agreement but the lawyers pushed the application forward anyways" sounds very...un-lawyer-y. Kinda sus.
Like, I want to believe you, it just seems weird of lawyers to do the thing without the i's dotted and t's crossed. I can see software devs totally barging ahead, but lawyers, less so.