Ok, so what do people expect the alternative route is? It's a known strategy, that works, and increases profit if implemented correctly.
That's our stock market though. If Walmart isn't squeezing on costs, then it needs to make that up in gross revenue otherwise the stock will suffer.
Is it possible to be "ethical" in how you define it, when the financial market performance of the company is largely dependent on this?
Walmart took it a step further - they have information for their employees on how to do that efficiently, rather than paying a living wage.
> Especially if you're already one of the richest companies to ever exist.
How do you think they got there in the first place?