Besides, reading the actual plans it's pretty clear that Disneyland Forward is more about repurposing and optimizing their current space rather than a "massive expansion" as you call it. Really feels like you're just making up a situation in order to "both sides" the issue.
In practice, this would about double the size of the current park (The detailed drawing represent the new areas, which are currently parking lots)
I guess we disagree on whether 2x is “massive”?
I think very few Californians are against converting surface parking into workplaces.
I'm also unclear how this is 'culture war'? Could you expand on that?
Weird that people like theme parks, yeah.