There are many factually accurate statements that are, nevertheless, inappropriate to wildly inappropriate under the circumstances. I have personally interacted with rms decades ago and have a generally positive impression of his entire body of contributions to computing. Nevertheless, reading the controversies section on the wikipedia page induces a combination of cringing and face-palming.

Someone researching the science of attraction in humans could very well be justified in saying "it is normal for adults to be physically attracted to adolescents".

Someone commenting in apparent defense of a convicted sex offender should not make that exact same claim, whether factually correct or not.