Regardless of the merits of the material and its author, I think the primary site, if anything, should be used.

If you find this valuable/entertaining enough to read then read it at the original URL.

If you find the author vile and/or the material not worth the time, linking to a ripped off copy of it doesn't make things better.

Because of the paradox of tolerance, and because you might not wanna connect to an extremist's website. You could argue you don't wanna read their writings either but AFAICT the writing is solid.

He's long passed into the "live long enough to see yourself become the villain" phase. He holds views on racial politics and race-intelligence issues whose evidence chain has been provably traced to "white-shoe racists", racist thinkers like Charles Murray with a patina of intellectualism and scientific rigor.

It seems only people who are loaded up on current buzzwords to be upset about are like that. On both sides.

Well adjusted people are able to overlook an offense.

"A person’s wisdom yields patience; it is to one’s glory to overlook an offense." - Proverbs 19:11