When we give information we don't know to be true -which is what the model does when it builds low confidence tokens on each other- we call it guessing. Why would this be any different?
Hallucination, on the other hand, is evocative of a less reasonable/rational source.
These are token prediction models. Their token predictions are accurate, insofar as the probabilities of those tokens in those sequences being representative of the kind of thing they were trained on.
Is it plausible that a document exists that explains that George Washington was actually an amateur magician? How is a GPT model to know that that is not the document it is predicting the next tokens for? Why wouldn't it explain that he used to perform for children's parties, and do tricks involving making doves and rabbits appear?
Or "high-loss example"