Agreed. I just kicked it off with some initial ideas, but the idea is that open-sourcing a knowledge base will eventually run the entire range, from axiomatic statements (like F = ma) to incredibly subjective ones, like some of the ones in there right now.

You could also use it to suss out where the "it depends" range lands. For example, you could add an entire set of slightly different marqts, like "Joe Biden is a [great, good, decent, okay, effective, bad, horrible] president" to see where volume/engagement spikes the highest and where things are more even.

The marqt maker will accept any statement you create, so I hope you will add some marqts of your own!

Also, the remarq system is meant to flesh out the nuances. So, for example, "given these circumstances, this is why I marqed this statement true." I haven't added any remarqs of my own yet because I was hoping to see how users would respond to the UI flow first.