That is actually a really interesting find. Some of the verbiage is parallel to the hype we have around AGI right now too "fusion by 1990 instead of 2000..." does that not sound exactly like AGI in X year up from Y year that we read now?
> "fusion by 1990 instead of 2000..." Those three dots are omitting the most important part of the issue if we spend that much extra money on R&D
In the fusion case no one was willing to spend the money, in AGI's case it looks like everyone seems to be willing to spend the money.
I personally hope they won't, but that is a crutial point not to be overlooked.