It doesn't seem like there's any reason to be suspicious about Legalweb. The attorneys in jsDelivr's post can be lifted up without putting Legalweb down.
There isn't much said editorially in the jsDelivr post. They didn't use a blockquote but it appears to be quoted until the last paragraph where it says "In conclusion". There are no editorial assertions in the intro. The conclusion appears not to match up with what the attorneys say.
What the attorney says is that jsDelivr, the service, is safe. It doesn't say that about sites that use it.
I agree with both the article and with jsDelivr's posts except the conclusion. jsDelivr will not be shut down just because of this ruling, but site owners may want to stop using it.
Here's the conclusion:
> In conclusion, the ruling that has been so controversial recently does not seem to fully address the factual and technical circumstances of how jsDelivr works, and at this point as a single ruling should not lead to any real concerns about using CDN's services. The arguments for extending to other online services a single ruling strongly emphasizing Google's failure to adequately protect personal data are insufficient and lack substance.
"should not lead to any real concerns" doesn't inspire confidence