Hacker News Reader

This comment captures exactly what I find concerning around the common line of thinking about AI.

How is a value judgement or moral that _I_ hold different than the list output by ChatGPT here?

Because the proposed "what if" question literally says to ignore ethics and morals. If you asked any human the same question they'd have similar answers, but it doesn't mean they'd act on it. The comment would be similarly silly if it was asked of a human and the comment was "look how deranged this human is!"

You actually identify with your values and they have personal meaning for you? You don't spit them out only when given a specific prompt, them becoming completely forgotten and irrelevant when given some other, perhaps contradictory prompt?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com