I was hoping for some domain-specific insight there. Instead, that was a thin article without much more than a blanket assertion. Could have copy/replaced “accountant” with pretty much any other knowledge worker.
As an AI language model, my goal is to provide relevant and helpful information based on the input I receive. If the article I generated did not meet your expectations or contained errors, I apologize for any inconvenience caused.
... and I promise to always do it again. Everything you say to me goes to /dev/null once we terminate this chat.
Surely you realize they’re using it all to train future models
Same feeling, it's incredible such a poor article can be behind a paywall