If you promote things like this as research tools, ways to extract technical information quickly from complex documents, hey cool. Trying to frame your product as an alternative to "traditional reading" makes me want to barf.
When you rely on something else to chunk the knowledge for you, you aren't doing the work.
These tools will be great when they don't miss the details relevant to you, but how are you getting the signal when they do miss details for you?
Same thing with Plato and writing. Writing did not limit memory for those that treated writing as a tool. Writing enabled the throughput of putting stuff into long term memory for many scholars. It also encouraged new ways of work. But a reference or summary could never replace what you put in your head.
We may still ingest knowledge for our own amusement but it won't serve any practical purpose.