I got into a bit of a fight over whether or not "Merge" should be an option on one's own PRs. "Trust" suggests that a developer
should be able to review their own code changes, especially for small/trivial things or "expert" level things that no one else feels qualified to review and just leave open for weeks/months instead of even trying to review it (in turn often making it harder to merge without conflicts).
There's a great value in "every change was peer reviewed by someone", of course. There's also a value in "not every change is significant and sometimes you can trust developers to know that".
You can possibly install the fear of accountability if a bug happens in code that the reviewer was the developer until they want that learning opportunity of a code review.
In my experience, most of the "expert-level" developers almost always would love any feedback anyone wanted to offer because their imposter syndrome tells them it is awful and not to sign off on it, but are also more likely to get blocked if their PRs don't move fast enough.