I strongly disagree with this and think much less of companies who do it that way. That said, that battle is already lost anyway.
I strongly disagree with this and think much less of companies who do it that way. That said, that battle is already lost anyway.
It's not like this is telemetry in some open source thing for nefarious reasons. It's literally for their customers. They already know who you are, it's not like they're using this for targeted ads.
Prove it. Right, you can't, because once telemetry runs you have no insight or control over what happens with the data. And trust is definitely not an option anymore after all that happened over the years.
That is more of a statement about the detestability of telemetry as a concept than anything else.
https://www.centenecenter.wustl.edu/by-the-power-of-default-...
Willful, informed, enthusiastic consent is what we're after.
No, it's not. "Consent" requires being informed first.
No it isn't implied.
This is said by every company that does telemetry.