Supabase Clippy was the first docs site to ship this experience to production as far as I can tell: https://supabase.com/blog/chatgpt-supabase-docs
I believe they called it "context injection" and I have been following suit in my own writing on the topic.
I am prototyping experiences like Supabase Clippy and am also very interested in fine-tuning for docs Q&A. But my main question is: what exactly would the fine-tuning inputs and outputs look like for docs Q&A?
Edit: For Q&A the question is the input and the answer is the desired output? Is that right?
A more general comment about fine-tuning for docs from my blog:
> AI is all about prediction. Given this temperature, this wind, this day of the year, what is the chance of rain? Temperature, wind, and date are your inputs. Chance of rain is your desired output. Now, try to apply this same type of thinking towards documentation. What are your inputs? What’s your output? The page title and code block could be your inputs. Whether or not the code builds could be your output. Or maybe the code block should be the output? This is why I keep saying that applying fine-tuning to docs is tricky. What are the inputs and outputs?
https://technicalwriting.tools/posts/ten-principles-response...
(I am an AI n00b and have not looked deeply into how fine-tuning works but it's high on my list to experiment with OpenAI's fine-tuning API. Please LMK if I am getting any fundamentals wrong.)