The title is true, but the claim that coedium is not violating licenses is false.
Many licenses still require attribution and Coedium is violating them.
Many licenses still require attribution and Coedium is violating them.
* Training an AI with the code is allowed legally.
* Storing model weights is allowed legally.
* Querying the AI with those model weights is allowed legally.
Or maybe not.
The only ambiguity as far as I can tell is GPL covers "source code", "machine-readable Corresponding Source", and "object code form", and it's not explicit whether vector-fields count as any of those things. I doubt anyone would seriously argue that zipping and then un-zipping some GPL source code means you don't need to respect the original license. LLMs are different in that they're lossy compared to the zip format - does the nature of this lossiness invalidate the intent of the GPL's original language? I doubt it.