The real reason people have been moving to these places.
There's no way to solve the problem. Unless you love living in those places, you can do much better for your future by leaving ,especially in this era of more acceptance of remote work.
The real reason people have been moving to these places.
There's no way to solve the problem. Unless you love living in those places, you can do much better for your future by leaving ,especially in this era of more acceptance of remote work.
Most of the people I know moving to those places are doing it mainly to escape cities run by politicians who care more about what people on Twitter think of them than actually helping their citizens. High crime, apathetic city councils, and poor schools are the cited reasons.
Most people I know who have moved have all said a similar thing: cost of living is a fraction and taxes are lower. It's not just politics - people aren't moving to Louisiana. Texas and Florida offer economic opportunity.
There are unique factors that can make this person in New York more valuable than in Houston. Chiefly: once their function is in Houston, why not Honduras?
The example sustains itself. If petroleum engineering could be done remotely, there is no chance it would continue to pay a premium for Houston-based talent.
> I’m not a fan of Houston but I think it has a much more impressive economy than New York
New York's economy is that of control and administration. Houston is to it as Baton Rouge is to Houston.
Because Houston is a large, relatively rich city with a well-educated workforce within a short drive of other large, rich cities and a short flight of others, whose citizens understand the unique problems that face American citizens and therefore can serve as excellent early adopters for consumer solutions for the American market?
Agreed. But if one's job and life go remote only, this ceases to be a differentiator. My entire argument is geography is far from becoming irrelevant. But if someone in Houston takes no advantage of their proximity to said "rich city with a well-educated workforce," they're competing against anyone with internet.
I agree, and it's something that I'd like to get ahead of if it's the world we're approaching.
In a world where high-skill-non-managerial jobs can be outsourced easier, wages will become depressed. Would you rather take what you have saved and try to get something in Houston now, or watch from New York as your income stagnates but your expenses grow with inflation?
Nobody knows the future, and remote work could very easily be phased out. Or we lean in and US companies draw from a pool of tens of millions of talented international software engineers.
It's a hell of a situation.
EDIT: lots of tweaks here and there.
Depends on if you’re learning and growing or coasting. Truth be told, I’m presently the latter, which is partly why I moved to Wyoming. That is not an option if you’re starting out. And it won’t be when I shift back into first gear.
I also fear remote is here to stay, with all of the wage changes that will create for skilled American labor (it'll do lots of good too, don't get me wrong!)
EDIT: >I don't see how anyone builds much of a life there before they're 35 anyway.
By this I suppose I meant that I don't see how I could build much of a life out there before I'm 35. I know a few people who pulled it off, but I'm under the impression it is an outlier outcome in a city of outliers.
I do too. And it means a return of apprenticeship. Nothing more, nothing less.