Wouldn't that likely result in there being no neurodivergent judges? It would undermine the whole idea of "trial by peers" if neurodivergent people are being tried purely by neurotypical people.
It’s “a jury of peers” - that line says nothing about judges. And indeed, judges have very little in common with the common person they see in court.
Sure, but it's still not really a democracy if the people judging or representing you don't reflect you.
I mean, 70+ years old judges don't represent or reflect people between ages of 20-30 either, but appointing people of that age to be judges isn't the solution. And that's ok. There are no judges representing people with borderline personality disorder, and I don't think this is a problem in need of a solution either. That's what the jury is for.